Talk:Wind & Wuthering

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wind & Wuthering article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Wind & Wuthering has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 10, 2018. (Reviewed version).

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Progressive Rock Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

About the Earl of Mar

In the "Songs" chapter of the article, it is said that ""Eleventh Earl of Mar" refers to the historical figure of John Erskine, Earl of Mar". If you click on the link, it appears that John Erskine is not the *11th* but the *23rd* Earl of Mar. The 11th Earl of Mar is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Erskine,_Earl_of_Mar_and_Kellie_(1839%E2%80%931888)

I don't know if it was Rutherford who confused the two historical figures or if it is instead a mistake by the person who created the internal link to wikipedia (I am not that knowledgeable about eighteenth-century English history...) however, it seemed fair to point this out. 80.72.160.55 (talk) 10:10, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the view of Rolling Stone ...

In their "Record Guide" they only gave it two stars, as they did for "Trick," and generally downplayed both as being inferior since Gabriel had left. So, this probably should be noted after the original magazine review. 2603:6080:21F0:7210:6510:E5C2:62AD:5E3E (talk) 12:48, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]